Charlie Sheens recent announcement that he has HIV has raised concerns about whether he may have transmitted the infection to other people.
While we obviously dont know his specific medical details (and really, its none of our business), HIV treatment is effective at reducing transmission. This is known as the treatment as prevention strategy.
There have been many advances in HIV care since Rock Hudson was diagnosed in the 1980s. At this time, the prognosis of AIDS was similar to patients with advanced cancer.
Since the mid-1990s, combinations of antivirals have markedly improved the survival of people living with HIV. Modern combinations are simple to take (as few as one tablet, once a day) and associated with much fewer side effects than older drugs.
Antiviral drugs work by interfering with the replication of HIV. This results in a drop in the viral load the concentration of virus detectable in blood.
This doesnt mean, however, that the virus is eradicated. HIV can hide in sanctuary sites in the body (known as latency) and will quickly become detectable if the antivirals are stopped. In many people taking treatment, the concentration of virus is often undetectable, but this doesnt exclude the possibility of very small amounts of circulating virus that are below the limit of the tests that detect them.
In the era before treatment, it was estimated that the risk of acquiring HIV was around one in 200 sexual encounters, which varied by the type of act and other factors.
There are now two new effective strategies to reduce this risk and prevent HIV infection: treating the person with HIV to suppress their viral load; and giving antivirals to the uninfected partner (prophylaxis) to stop them becoming infected.
It has long been known that the risk of transmission is related to the amount of virus present in the body. A number of trials now show that treatment of people with HIV dramatically reduces the risk of transmission.
A trial of 1,763 couples where one partner was HIV positive and the other was HIV negative recorded only one transmission in the group on antiviral treatment compared to 27 who were not on treatment.
It should be noted that the participants of these trials were given the usual advice to prevent HIV transmission in addition to antiviral treatment, including the use of condoms. The initial trial primarily included heterosexual couples, but the subsequent studies have extended the evidence to gay men.
For the uninfected partner, post-exposure prophylaxis (taking antivirals like a morning after pill) or pre-exposure prophylaxis (taking antivirals continuously like the oral contraceptive) are also effective options.
In those taking preventive antivirals, the protection against HIV infection appears to be near complete. But as with the oral contraceptive, antivirals only work if they are taken.
The evidence suggests both strategies are highly effective at preventing HIV infection. However, antivirals do have some potential side effects. And in many countries, including Australia, they are not yet approved for prophylaxis.
They also do not protect against other sexually transmitted infections (such as syphilis or gonorrhoea) and need to be combined with other risk-reduction strategies.
Both treatment as prevention and pre-exposure prophylaxis rely on the individual knowing his or her HIV status. This reinforces the importance of diagnosing HIV, so that treatment can be offered both for the benefit of the person with HIV, as well as for their uninfected partners.
Like the prevention of pregnancy, there are many potential options to prevent HIV and these should be carefully considered with the persons treating doctor. But treatment as prevention and pre-exposure prophylaxis are clearly major advances in our goal to eliminate HIV transmission.